Gargano

Gargano v. Plus One Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20233:22-cv-00735California7,613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 22-cv-00735-DMS-MMP

AMBER GARGANO,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

PLUS ONE HOLDINGS, INC., Defendant. 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant Plus One Holding’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 19.) In this diversity case, Plaintiff, Amber Gargano (“Gargano”), a citizen of California, sues her employer, Plus One Holdings, Inc. (“Plus One”), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, asserting various causes of action related to disability discrimination in employment in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to the motion (ECF No. 23) and defendant filed a reply in support of its motion (ECF No. 27). For the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES the motion in full. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plus One hired Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.