Cousin

Cousin v. Sharp Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20233:22-cv-02040California6,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 HANNAH COUSIN, et al., individually Case No.: 22-cv-2040-MMA (DDL) and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs,

15 v. [Doc. No. 15]

SHARP HEALTHCARE,

17 Defendant. 18 19 This action consists of three consolidated cases brought by Hannah Cousin, Linda Camus, Deanna Franklin-Pittman, and Edward Barbat (“Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Sharp Healthcare (“Defendant” or “Sharp”). See Case Nos. 22-cv-2040-MMA (DDL), 23-cv-33-MMA (DDL), 23-cv-330-MMA (DDL). On March 3, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint alleging that Defendant intentionally disclosed its patients’ sensitive health information, without their consent, to Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) through the procurement and embedding of an internet tracking tool, Meta Pixel, on its website. Doc. No. 14 (“CAC”). On April 4, 2022, the Defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.