Lindland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LINDLAND, Case No.: 3:21-cv-417-JES-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION FOR TUSIMPLE, INC. et al.,

RECONSIDERATION AND

Defendants. (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS

17 [ECF Nos. 64, 65]

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John Lindland’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration (“Motion”). Defendant TuSimple (“Defendant”) opposes the motion and has filed a Motion for Sanctions asking for attorney’s fees. Based upon the pleadings and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Attorney Fees. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action and filed a complaint asserting causes of action for: (1) Retaliation in Violation of a Public Policy; (2) Wrongful Termination; (3) Hostile Work Environment; (4) Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; and (5) Conversion. ECF No. 1.…