Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20233:21-cv-00812California6,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No.: 21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB

Plaintiff,

PUBLIC

v. [REDACTED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.,

IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. [ECF No. 209]

19 Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Defendant”), seeking to compel discovery from Plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 209.) Specifically, Defendant seeks ten documents Plaintiff clawed back, one document Plaintiff withheld, and deposition testimony, all of which relate to pre-suit analysis of Defendant’s Taptic Engine conducted by Plaintiff’s principals, Dr. Silmon James Biggs and Mr. John Steinberg. (See ECF Nos. 209; 253; 255.) Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 223), to which Defendant replied (ECF No. 227). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 209) is GRANTED in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.