Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No.: 21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
Plaintiff,
PUBLIC
v. [REDACTED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.,
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
COMPEL
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. [ECF No. 209]
19 Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Defendant”), seeking to compel discovery from Plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 209.) Specifically, Defendant seeks ten documents Plaintiff clawed back, one document Plaintiff withheld, and deposition testimony, all of which relate to pre-suit analysis of Defendant’s Taptic Engine conducted by Plaintiff’s principals, Dr. Silmon James Biggs and Mr. John Steinberg. (See ECF Nos. 209; 253; 255.) Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 223), to which Defendant replied (ECF No. 227). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 209) is GRANTED in part…