Davis

Davis v. Edery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20233:23-cv-01333California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRE DAVIS, Case No.: 23cv1333-CAB (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

ABNER EDERY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Alexandre Davis (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint accompanied by a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a failure to prepay the entire fee only if leave to proceed IFP is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See

26 In addition to a $350 fee, civil litigants, other than those granted leave to proceed IFP, must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial 28 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.