Murillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONA SALCIDA MURILLO, Case No.: 22cv0548-TWR-SBC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, REQUEST TO DEEM DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS WAIVED

DUE TO UNTIMELINESS

A. RAMOS, et al.,

15 Defendants. [ECF Nos. 69; 78] 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on (1) Plaintiff’s Notice to the Court of Defendants Not Filing a Timely Response to the Second Amended Complaint in Violation of F.R.C.P. Rule 15(a)(3) (ECF No. 69) and (2) Plaintiff’s Notice to the Court of Defendants’ Continual Failure to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint Such Be Deemed Waived (ECF No. 78), which the Court construes as motions to strike Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. Rule 15 provides that any response to an amended pleading “must be made within the time remaining to respond to the original pleading or within 14 days after service of the amended pleading, whichever is later.”…