Lingenfelter

Lingenfelter v. Bank of England

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20233:23-cv-00775California1,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MICHAEL JAMES LINGENFELTER, Case No. 23-cv-0775-BAS-KSC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. 1. GRANTING MOTION FOR

BANK OF ENGLAND, LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 3); Defendant.

15 2. DENYING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY (ECF NO. 5); AND

3. TO SHOW CAUSE WITH

RESPECT TO FRIVOLOUSNESS

20 Plaintiff Michael James Lingenfelter, proceeding pro se, files this action against his former employer, Defendant Bank of England. Plaintiff alleges (1) wrongful termination; (2) workplace harassment; (3) mental, verbal, and physical abuse/bullying, (4) retaliation, (5) false claims, slander, defamation, and libel, (6) hostile workplace environment, and (7) interference with prospective economic relations. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also files an application seeking leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, also known as proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.