Hamilton

Hamilton v. Moseley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20233:21-cv-02032California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DANNY L. HAMILTON, Case No.: 3:21-cv-02032-CAB-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

MOTION TO AMEND

v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

AMIR MOHAMED, [ECF No. 76] Defendant. 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time for 60 Days Beyond August 1, 2023 Cut-Off Date for Discovery (ECF No. 76) (“Plaintiff’s Motion”), and Defendant’s Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Discovery Cut-Off (ECF No. 77), in which Defendant states his non-opposition to Plaintiff’s request to continue the discovery cutoff in this action by 60 days, and further requests that the Court continue all other case deadlines by 60 days. Upon consultation with the presiding District Judge in this matter, the Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and Defendant’s related request. The Scheduling Order and briefing schedule deadlines for the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.