Hamilton
Hamilton v. Moseley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DANNY L. HAMILTON, Case No.: 3:21-cv-02032-CAB-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO AMEND
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
AMIR MOHAMED, [ECF No. 76] Defendant. 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time for 60 Days Beyond August 1, 2023 Cut-Off Date for Discovery (ECF No. 76) (“Plaintiff’s Motion”), and Defendant’s Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Discovery Cut-Off (ECF No. 77), in which Defendant states his non-opposition to Plaintiff’s request to continue the discovery cutoff in this action by 60 days, and further requests that the Court continue all other case deadlines by 60 days. Upon consultation with the presiding District Judge in this matter, the Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and Defendant’s related request. The Scheduling Order and briefing schedule deadlines for the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment…