Cuttino Jr. v. Walmart Western Union
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20233:23-cv-01111California1,404 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 MAURICE CUTTINO JR., Case No. 23-cv-1111-BAS-JLB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. 1. GRANTING MOTION FOR
WALMART WESTERN UNION, LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 3); Defendant.
15 2. SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E); AND
17 3. DENYING AS MOOT MOTION
TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF
No. 2) 20 Plaintiff Maurice Cuttino Jr., proceeding pro se, files this action against Defendant Walmart Western Union. The Complaint alleges violations of the Privacy Act of 1974, “First Amendment defamation,” slander, “seditious libel,” and fraud. (Compl. 2–4, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also files an application seeking leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, also known as proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”), (IFP Mot., ECF No. 3) and a motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP (ECF No. 3),…