Shane
Shane v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDA SHANE, individually and as Case No.: 22-CV-1309-JO-SBC successor-in-interest for Decedent Isaiah 12 Shane, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN Plaintiff,
ORDER EXCUSING NATSA
14 v. DEFENDANTS FROM ATTENDANCE AT ENE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants.
18 Before the Court is the National Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abuse 19 (“NATSA”), Yoshita Conrad, Freddy Macias, and Jeanette Villarreal’s (collectively, 20 “NATSA Defendants”) Ex Parte Application for an Order Excusing NATSA Defendants 21 from Attendance at ENE (“Ex Parte Application”). (Doc. No. 74.) In relevant part, the 22 NATSA Defendants move the Court for an order excusing individual Defendants Conrad, 23 Macias, and Villarreal from appearing at the July 27, 2023, Video Early Neutral Evaluation 24 Conference (“ENE”) in this matter. The NATSA Defendants explain Conrad will be on a 25 pre-paid vacation,…