Ethridge

Ethridge v. Perales

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20233:23-cv-00763California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARL ETHRIDGE, Case No.: 23-CV-763-GPC-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

v. ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE

A CLAIM AND FOR FAILING TO

H. PERALES, parole supervisor; SEAN

PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

MASTERSON, parole agent; and Dr. WITH COURT ORDER REQUIRING KINGSTON, HOPE program supervisor,

AMENDMENT

15 Defendants.

17 On April 26, 2023, Plaintiff Carl Ethridge (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se, filed a 18 complaint against Defendants H. Perale, parole supervisor; Sean Masterson, parole agent 19 and Dr. Kingston, Hope Program Supervisor. (Dkt. No. 1, Compl.) On May 5, 2023, the 20 Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, sua sponte dismissed the 21 complaint for failing to state a claim and seeking monetary damages against immune 22 Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 5.) 23 The Court also denied Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.