Snelson

Snelson v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20233:22-cv-00551California1,791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN TODD SNELSON , Case No.: 22-cv-551-BAS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER TO

SUBSTITUTE EXPERT

DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH

AMERICA, LLC, formerly [Dkt. No. 75]

FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION;

PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO. L.P.;

PENSKE CORPORATION; PENSKE

AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.,

18 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Deadline to Identify Experts (“Motion”) [Dkt. No. 75]. Defendants Daimler Trucks North America, LLC (“Daimler”) and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. (“Penske”) oppose the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause to amend the scheduling order and substitute his expert witness. The Court further concludes that an extension of pretrial deadlines, including the deadline for Daimler to furnish rebuttal expert designations and disclosures, is warranted to avoid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.