Caricofe

Caricofe v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20233:23-cv-01012California1,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADLEY CARICOFE, SHAWN Case No.: 23-CV-1012 TWR (AHG)

THIBODEAUX, JULIE THIBODEAUX,

12 KENNETH HUNNEL, and LEANNE ORDER DENYING WITHOUT HUNNEL, individually, and on behalf of PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ a class of similarly situated individuals, UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND

Plaintiffs, LEAD COUNSEL v. 16 (ECF No. 4) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware 17 corporation, 18 Defendant. 19 20 Presently before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel filed by Plaintiffs Bradley Caricofe, Shawn Thibodeaux, Julie Thibodeaux, Kenneth Hunnel, and Leanne Hunnel in this putative class action. (ECF No. 4, “Mot.”) Defendant Ford Motor Company does not oppose the Motion. (See Mot. at 3.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court deems this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. Having considered Plaintiffs’ arguments and the relevant law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.