Dale Sundby v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20233:23-cv-01239California769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALE SUNDBY and EDITH Case No.: 23-CV-01239-GPC-AHG

LITTLEFIELD SUNDBY; DALE

12 SUNDBY and EDITH LITTLEFIELD ORDER OVERRULING SUNDBY, Trustees, OBJECTION TO TRANSFER

PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER

Plaintiffs,

RULE

v. [ECF No. 78] FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY; and DOES 1-X, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19 On July 27, 2023, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 40.1.e and over Plaintiffs Dale Sundby’s and Edith Littlefield Sundby’s objections, Case No. 23-cv-1239 was transferred to Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. ECF No. 77; see ECF No. 72, 74 (objections). Plaintiffs have filed an additional objection to the transfer, ECF No. 78, which the Court overrules for the reasons explained below. In an effort to conserve judicial resources and “to avoid unnecessary duplication of judicial effort,” Rule 40.1(j) instructs that “all pending civil actions and proceedings, which 27 are determined to be related to any other pending civil action or proceeding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.