Hall
Hall v. Val-Chris Investments, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20233:23-cv-01349California4,269 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HALL, an individual, Case No.: 23-CV-1349 TWR (JLB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR A
VAL-CHRIS INVESTMENTS, INC.,
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
a business entity; LOANCUTTERS, INC. ORDER TO RESTRAIN A dba EVOQUE LENDING, a corporation;
TRUSTEE’S SALE, AND (2) FOR
and DOES 1–50, inclusive,
DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendants. WHY A PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE
(ECF No. 5)
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Hall’s Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order to Restrain a Trustee’s Sale (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 5). Plaintiff’s counsel provided notice to Defendants Val-Chris Investments, Inc. (“Val- Chris”) and LoanCutters, Inc. dba Evoque Lending (“Evoque”) at approximately noon on July 25, 2023. (See ECF No. 5-2 (“Adair Decl.”) ¶¶ 3–5.) …