Hall

Hall v. Val-Chris Investments, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20233:23-cv-01349California4,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HALL, an individual, Case No.: 23-CV-1349 TWR (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR A

VAL-CHRIS INVESTMENTS, INC.,

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

a business entity; LOANCUTTERS, INC. ORDER TO RESTRAIN A dba EVOQUE LENDING, a corporation;

TRUSTEE’S SALE, AND (2) FOR

and DOES 1–50, inclusive,

DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants. WHY A PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE

(ECF No. 5)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Hall’s Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order to Restrain a Trustee’s Sale (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 5). Plaintiff’s counsel provided notice to Defendants Val-Chris Investments, Inc. (“Val- Chris”) and LoanCutters, Inc. dba Evoque Lending (“Evoque”) at approximately noon on July 25, 2023. (See ECF No. 5-2 (“Adair Decl.”) ¶¶ 3–5.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.