Hammerlord

Hammerlord v. Elliott

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20233:23-cv-00663California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 M NORMAN HAMMERLORD, Case No.: 23cv663-JO-KSC 9 Plaintiff, 10 v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION MARA W ELLIOTT, San Diego City Attorney, and TODD GLORIA, San Diego City Mayor, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 On April 12, 2023, pro se Plaintiff M Norman Hammerlord filed a complaint alleging that Defendants San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott and San Diego City Mayor Todd Gloria refused to provide him with public records. Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. On June 9, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint in full under U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Dkt. 3. On July 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. Dkt. 4. The Court denies this request for reconsideration because Plaintiff has not identified newly discovered evidence, intervening law, clear error, or manifest injustice. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty. v. ACandS, Inc., F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.