Hovis

Hovis v. Homeaglow, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20233:23-cv-00045California3,100 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIE HOVIS, an individual;

GENARO MENDOZA, an individual, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00045-BTM-WVG on behalf of themselves and all others 12 similarly situated Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO COMPEL

vs. ARBITRATION, STAY

PROCEEDINGS AND GRANTING

HOMEAGLOW, INC., a Delaware MOTION TO DISMISS corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. 17 Defendant Homeaglow, Inc., (“Defendant”) has filed a motion to compel 18 arbitration, stay court proceedings pending arbitration and dismiss class claims. For 19 the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS the motion. 20 21 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Marie Hovis (“Hovis”) and Genaro Mendoza (“Mendoza”) have filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendant, Homeaglow Inc., a cleaning service application. Plaintiffs were required to register and create a profile on the Defendant’s application, which involved completing nine steps. ECF No. 17, at 2. To finalize their account, the Plaintiffs had to sign a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.