Mcanally

Mcanally v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20233:18-cv-02272-GPC-RNBCalifornia2,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN M., Case No.: 18-CV-2272-GPC-RNB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [ECF No. 24] Commissioner of Social Security, (2) DENYING AS MOOT JOINT Defendant. REQUEST FOR DECISION ON THE

PLEADINGS

[ECF No. 30]

18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Sean M.’s motion for approval of attorney’s fees 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ECF No. 24. Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi filed a response 20 declining to take a position on the motion. ECF No. 27. Sean M. did file not any pro se 21 response. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d, the Court finds the matter is appropriate for 22 decision on the papers and hereby VACATES the hearing previously scheduled for 23 August 11, 2023. 24 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion for attorney’s fees. 25 The Parties’ joint request for a decision on the pleadings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.