Bey
Bey v. Schneider
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRITANYA RANITA BEY, Case No. 23-cv-1042-BAS-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING IN FORMA STEVE SCHNEIDER, et al.,
PAUPERIS APPLICTION (ECF
Defendants. No. 2); and
16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO
18 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
20 Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Britanya Ranita Bey (“Bey”) brought this civil action on June 5, 2023. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) That same day, Bey filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (IFP App., ECF No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Bey’s IFP Application (ECF No. 2), DISMISSES without prejudice the Complaint (ECF No. 1); and GRANTS Bey leave to file a First Amended Complaint. I. IFP APPLICATION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. …