Alexander
Alexander v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO J. ALEXANDER, Case No.: 23-cv-617-DMS-BLM
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff filed an opposition, (ECF No. 5), and Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 6). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was a 29-year customer of Wells Fargo. (Compl. ¶ 5.) On or about December 15, 2022, Plaintiff and his son went to a Wells Fargo location in San Diego County with the intention of depositing funds in Plaintiff’s account. (Id. ¶¶ 6-7.) Upon arrival, Plaintiff was “shocked to discover his accounts were practically…