McCoy

McCoy v. California Civil Rights Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20233:23-cv-01013California1,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-1013-DMS-JLB

LEILA MARIE MCCOY,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING

CALIFORNIA CIVIL RIGHTS

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

DEPARTMENT,

STATE A CLAIM Defendant. 16 17 On May 31, 2023, Plaintiff Leila Marie McCoy, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant California Civil Rights Department. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Pl.’s Mot. to Proceed IFP (“Mot.”), ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff sues the California Civil Rights Department following its alleged denial of Plaintiff’s request for accommodations due to her disabilities. (Compl. 2–3.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP and DISMISSES the action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.