Huntley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 KATEY HUNTLEY and GARY Case No. 22-cv-1172-L-MDD JACKSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT 777 PARTNERS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

[ECF NO. 8]; and

ROSEBUD ECONOMIC (2) DENYING DEFENDANT 777 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al. PARTNER’S MOTION TO

DISMISS AS MOOT [ECF NO.

Defendants. 9]

21 Pending before the Court are Defendant 777 Partner, LLC’s (“777”) Motion to 22 Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 8] and Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 9], in this putative class 23 action. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. 24 See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants 25 Motion to Compel Arbitration and DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 26 // 27 // I. BACKGROUND On November 29, 2019, Plaintiff Katey Huntley (“Huntley”)…