Corpuz
Corpuz v. Walmart, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDISON CORPUZ, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00901-RBM-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
v. WALMART INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS COMPLAINT
WALMART, INC.
Defendant.
16 [Doc. 7] 17 On September 2, 2022, Defendant Walmart, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint (“Motion”). (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff Edison Corpuz (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition on September 26, 2022 (Doc. 10), and Defendant filed a reply on October 10, 2022 (Doc. 11). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff is an individual alleging he purchased Defendant’s Spring Valley 1000 mg Fish Oil dietary supplement (the “Product”) “on several occasions over the past 3 years, including most recently in or around December 2021.” (Doc. 1 at 6.) Plaintiff contends Defendant engaged in “deceptive practices associated with the…