Cunningham

Cunningham v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20233:23-cv-00351California3,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MELVIN LYNN CUNNINGHAM, Jr., Case No.: 3:23-cv-00351-JAH-NLS CDCR No. F78919,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 12 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 6] RAMOS, Alfonso, Correctional Officer;

MORA, Jessica, Correctional Officer, (2) SCREENING COMPLAINT Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. 17 § 1915A(b) 18 19 Plaintiff Melvin Lynn Cunningham, Jr. (“Plaintiff” or “Cunningham”), who is proceeding pro se and is currently housed at R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 21, 2023. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Cunningham did not prepay the civil filing fee and did not file a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), and so the Court dismissed this case without prejudice and gave Cunningham forty-five (45) days to either pay the civil filing fee or file an IFP motion. Id. On June 14, 2023, Cunningham filed an IFP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.