Whited

Whited v. Young

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20233:23-cv-01299California836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON JAMES WHITED, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01299-JES-MSB

CDCR# BS0611,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY vs. FILING FEES REQUIRED BY 14 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

YOUNG, ELIZABETH HACKETT,

ADAM LANGKOWSKI, JESUS

[ECF No. 1] MANABAT, Defendants. 18 Aaron James Whited (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1. He has failed, however, to pay the filing fee or apply to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.