Hernandez-Garcia

Hernandez-Garcia v. Dana

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20233:21-cv-01673California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENGRACIA HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Case No.: 21-cv-1673-JAH-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

ISAAC PENHOS DANA, ESTER [Dkt. No. 114]

SUTTON DE SACAL, SAMUEL

PENHOS, ALICIA SACAL DE

PENHOS, Defendants. 18 I. BACKGROUND On August 4, 2023, Plaintiff’s attorney Benjamin R. Botts filed a motion to withdraw as Plaintiff’s counsel (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 114. Mr. Botts states that after August 4, 2023, he will cease to be employed by Centro de los Derechos del Migrante, Inc. (“CDM”), one of two law firms representing Plaintiff. Mr. Botts further explains that Plaintiff will continue to be represented by all other attorneys of record at CDM and the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP (“WilmerHale”). Good cause appearing, the Motion is GRANTED. / / / II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.