Collier

Collier v. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20233:23-cv-01248California1,157 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRINA COLLIER, on behalf of herself Case No.: 23-cv-1248-DMS-AHG and all others similarly situated,

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS; AND (2) DENYING AS

MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DONALD TRUMP, et al., ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC FILING Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Irina Collier has submitted a Complaint (ECF No. 1) along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff additionally filed a motion for access to file electronically. (ECF No. 3.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP is denied, and Plaintiff’s motion for access to electronic filing is denied as moot. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP A party initiating a civil action must typically pay the required filings fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But a plaintiff can proceed without paying the fee if granted leave to 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.