IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE WATROUS JR.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO Case No. 23-mc-80181-VKD
JEFFREY WILLIAMS AND BRUCE
WATROUS JR..
ORDER TRANSFERRING MOTION
TO QUASH SUBPOENA; VACATING
HEARING
11 Re: Dkt. No. 1
13 Apple Inc., Jeffrey Williams, and Bruce Watrous, Jr. (“Non-Parties”) move to quash 14 subpoenas for the depositions of Mr. Williams and Mr. Watrous served by lead plaintiffs and 15 defendant Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) in the matter In Re Qualcomm Inc. Securities 16 Litigation, 3:17-cv-00121-JO-MSB (S.D. Cal.). See Dkt. No 1-1, Exs. B, C. Both depositions are 17 noticed to occur at locations within the Northern District of California. Id. 18 Rule 45(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[w]hen the court where 19 compliance is required did not issue the subpoena, it may transfer a [motion to quash the 20 subpoena] to the issuing court if the person subject to the subpoena consents or if the court finds 21 exceptional circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f). …