Cairns

Cairns v. Quinn

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20233:22-cv-01979California2,338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NIGEL CAIRNS, Case No.: 22cv1979-LL-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

TOMMY QUINN, et al., [ECF No. 9] Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Robert Longstreth and Abraham Barragan (together, the “Superior Court Defendants”), filed on February 10, 2023. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff filed his response in opposition on July 19, 2023 [ECF No. 17], and the Superior Court Defendants filed their Reply on August 2, 2023 [ECF No. 18]. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss because the Superior Court Defendants are entitled to absolute judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, respectively. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.