Ramos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RONALD RAMOS, Case No.: 23-cv-0757-L-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and

DOES 1–10,

[ECF No. 3] Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss the complaint. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff Ronald Ramos (“Plaintiff”) opposed, (ECF No. 4), and Defendant replied, (ECF No. 5). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. I. INTRODUCTION According to the allegations in the complaint, Plaintiff maintained a savings account with Defendant. (ECF No. 1, Compl., at 3.) Due to Defendant’s failure to properly maintain Plaintiff’s personal information, unknown individuals accessed 27 …