Brenneman

Brenneman v. Dexcom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20233:23-cv-00167California1,231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Brenneman, Case No.: 23cv00167-JO-MPP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

Dexcom, Inc.,

TO DISMISS

Defendant. 16 17 18 On January 27, 2023, Plaintiff Katherine Brenneman filed a state law product liability action against Defendant Dexcom, Inc. in San Diego County superior court. Dkt. 11, Ex. A. On January 30, 2023, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal of the action to this Court. Dkt. 1. On February 20, 2023, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, and on March 1, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkts. 7, 11. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to remand and denies Defendant’s motion to dismiss as moot. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated a product liability suit in state court but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.