Rashidiasl

Rashidiasl v. MEP (ESIS/ Arch/ Chubb)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20233:23-cv-00325California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FARIBA RASHIDIASL, Case No.: 23-CV-0325-GPC-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REJECTING DOCUMENTS

v. AND STRIKING THEM FROM THE

DOCKET AND GRANTING

MEP (ESIS/ARCH/CHUBB); IQARUS

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN

(international SOS), AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 15 [Dkt. Nos. 17, 18.] 16 On February 17, 2023, Plaintiff Fariba Rashidiasl (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendants MEP (ESIS/ARCH/CHUBB) and Iqarus (International SOS) along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and motion to appoint counsel. (Dkt. Nos. 1, Compl.; Dkt. Nos. 2, 3.) On May 30, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis1, sua sponte dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and denied the motion to appoint counsel as moot. (Dkt. No. 12.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to cure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.