Thirty Three Threads, Inc. v. Pacific Manufacturing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20233:23-cv-01459California713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THIRTY THREE THREADS, INC., Case No.: 23-CV-1459-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING STATE

v. CLAIMS PACIFIC MANUFACTURING LLC et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 In its original complaint, Plaintiff asserted five claims – three federal claims against Defendant Pacific Manufacturing LLC (“Pacific”), and two state claims against Pacific and three other Defendants. Because the Court was not convinced that it even has the discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), it ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the state claims should not be dismissed. On August 21, 2023, Plaintiff responded to the order to show cause and filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) that added a federal claim against Pacific only. Upon review of the FAC and Plaintiff’s response to the order to show cause, the Court is not persuaded that it has the discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.