Canales

Canales v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20233:23-cv-01059California3,674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:23-cv-1059-GPC-MSB

ANGEL CHRISTOPHER CANALES,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTIONS

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS [ECF Nos. 2, 5] and

GUZMAN, Warden, GOVERNMENT (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

CLAIMS OFFICIAL, MAIL ROOM

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

SERGEANT,

PURUSANT TO 28 U.S.C.

Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION On June 2, 2023, Plaintiff, Angel Christopher Canales (“Plaintiff” or “Canales”), an inmate at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”) and proceeding pro se, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. On June 13, 2023, the Court dismissed the action because Canales had not prepaid the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and had not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). In its Order, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.