Rahimian
Rahimian v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAYMAN RAHIMIAN, Case No. 23-cv-0628-BAS-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 14)
MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH
AMERICA, INC.,
15 Defendant.
Before this Court is the parties’ request to dismiss with prejudice this action. (Joint Mot., ECF No. 14.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment, see id. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, see id. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). See also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is effective upon the filing of a compliant notice or stipulation. No court order is required. See Stone v. Woodford, CIV- F-05-845 AWI-DLB, 2007 WL 527766…