Latham

Latham v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20233:20-cv-02177California2,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSHUA LAWRENCE LATHAM, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02177-LAB-BGS

REPORT AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION THAT v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS BE

DENIED

MARCUS POLLARD, ET AL.,

12 Defendants. [ECF 66, 68]

14 Before the Court are two motions by Joshua Lawrence Latham, Plaintiff, an inmate 15 with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Plaintiff 16 moves for leave to file a second amended complaint (SAC) (ECF 66), and to amend his 17 pretrial order to extend the time in which he can join parties, amend the pleadings, or file 18 additional pleadings (ECF 68). For the following reasons, the Court recommends that the 19 motions be DENIED.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

21 The complaint in this case was filed on November 5, 2020. It was screened under 22 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and on November 17, 2021, all claims were dismissed. (ECF 29.) 23 Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) on December 27, 2021. (ECF 30.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.