Settrini

Settrini v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20233:20-cv-02273California2,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINSTON DURRELL SETTRINI, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02273-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO

EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

DAMAGES RELATED TO

Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S LAWFUL ARREST

16 [Doc. 64] 17 18 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion in limine No. 3 to exclude evidence of damages related to Plaintiff’s lawful arrest (“Motion in limine No. 3”). (Doc. 64.) Plaintiff filed a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 3 (“Opposition”). (Doc. 72.) In Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 3, Defendants seek to exclude testimony, evidence, or arguments regarding damages from: (i) Plaintiff’s time spent in custody after his lawful arrest, including the length of time, allegations of emotional distress, and any bail payments, (ii) Plaintiff’s emotional distress related to a fear of prosecution, and (iii) 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.