Settrini

Settrini v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20233:20-cv-02273California2,535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINSTON DURRELL SETTRINI, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02273-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO

ADMIT EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

ARRESTS AND HISTORY

Defendants. [Doc. 63] 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion in limine No. 2 to admit evidence of criminal arrests and history (“Motion in limine No. 2”). (Doc. 63.) Plaintiff filed a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 2 (“Opposition”). (Doc. 71.) In Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 2, Defendants seek to admit Plaintiff’s prior criminal history, including: (1) a 2010 conviction for driving under the influence (“DUI”) where Plaintiff received five years of probation and multiple warrants were issued for Plaintiff’s violating probation; (2) a 2011 conviction for DUI, driving with a suspended license, and driving without a license where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.