Allison

Nelson v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20233:22-cv-00377California774 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Natasha Hilda NELSON Case No.: 22-cv-00377-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 38]; and (2) GRANTING IN PART Kathleen ALLISON, et al.,

AND DENYING IN PART MOTION

Defendants. TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 26] 16 On March 18, 2022, Defendants Allison, Gibson, Pollard, Buckel, Benyard, Garcia, Glynn and Cohen (“Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 26.] On August 4, 2023, Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard prepared a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. [Doc. No. 38.] The Report also ordered that any objections were to be filed by August 18, 2023. [Report at 43.] To date, no objections have been filed, nor have there been any requests for an extension of time in which to file an objection. A district court’s duties concerning a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.