Ridgeline Tactical LLC v. Bureau of ATF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RIDGELINE TACTICAL LLC, Case No.: 23-cv-00060-DMS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO

AND FIREARMS; SAN DIEGO

COUNTY PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; AND

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT,

18 Defendants. 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms’ (“ATF”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition, and Defendant ATF did not file a reply. A district court may grant an unopposed motion pursuant to a local rule which permits as much. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995). If an opposing party fails to file a response in opposition to a motion, that failure may constitute consent to the granting of a motion pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c). “Although there is . . . a policy favoring disposition on the…