Mongkol Muay Thai Corporation v. JG (Thailand) Company Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20233:22-cv-00506California2,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONGKOL MUAY THAI Case No. 22-cv-00506-BAS-KSC

CORPORATION,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

LEAVE TO SERVE DEFENDANT

JG (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED,

UNDER RULE 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) AND Defendant. RULE 4(f)(3)

[ECF No. 20]

Plaintiff Mongkol Muay Thai (“Mongkol”) moves, ex parte, for an order directing the Clerk of Court to serve Defendant JG (Thailand) Company Limited (“JG”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) and/or authorizing alternative service using email pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3). (Ex Parte App., ECF No. 20.) For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Mongkol’s Application. (ECF No. 20.) I. BACKGROUND In this action, Mongkol alleges that JG, a Thai corporation headquartered in 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.