Mongkol Muay Thai Corporation v. JG (Thailand) Company Limited
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20233:22-cv-00506California2,780 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONGKOL MUAY THAI Case No. 22-cv-00506-BAS-KSC
CORPORATION,
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND
Plaintiff, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
LEAVE TO SERVE DEFENDANT
JG (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED,
UNDER RULE 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) AND Defendant. RULE 4(f)(3)
[ECF No. 20]
Plaintiff Mongkol Muay Thai (“Mongkol”) moves, ex parte, for an order directing the Clerk of Court to serve Defendant JG (Thailand) Company Limited (“JG”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) and/or authorizing alternative service using email pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3). (Ex Parte App., ECF No. 20.) For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Mongkol’s Application. (ECF No. 20.) I. BACKGROUND In this action, Mongkol alleges that JG, a Thai corporation headquartered in 27 …