Paris

Paris v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20233:22-cv-00565California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Michael Andrew PARIS, Case No.: 22-cv-0565-AGS-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND

v.

GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

Marcus POLLARD, (ECF 8) WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Defendant. 8 On July 27, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, urging this Court to grant defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend and giving plaintiff Michael Andrew Paris 14 days to object. (See ECF 13, at 12–13.) To date, Paris has not objected. The district judge “must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)). Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the Court finds it well reasoned and without any clear error. So, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s recommendation: 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF 8) is GRANTED with leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.