Brant

Williams v. Brant

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20233:23-cv-00241California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY LEE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 23-CV-241-TWR (DDL) Inmate #21114692,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

Plaintiff, FAILING TO PROSECUTE IN v. COMPLIANCE WITH COURT

ORDER

BRANT, Lieutenant #2880, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Tommy Lee Williams, who is proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint (ECF No. 1, “Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) on February 6, 2023. Plaintiff alleged Defendants violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. (See generally Compl.) On May 9, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP Motion but dismissed the Complaint for failing to state a claim pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1). (See ECF No. 5.) The Court gave Plaintiff forty- five (45) days to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 20–21.) Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint was due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.