Settrini

Settrini v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20233:20-cv-02273California3,893 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINSTON DURRELL SETTRINI, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02273-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 TO

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

LIMIT OR EXCLUDE CERTAIN

Defendants. OPINIONS BY PLAINTIFF’S

EXPERT, ROGER A. CLARK

[Doc. 62] 18 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion in limine No. 1 to limit or exclude certain opinions by Plaintiff’s expert, Roger A. Clark (“Motion in limine No. 1”). (Doc. 62.) Plaintiff filed a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 1 (“Opposition”). (Doc. 70.) The Court takes the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND On July 21, 2019, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.