Keith

Keith v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20233:22-cv-01226California1,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHEN KEITH, Case No. 22-cv-1226-MMA-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO SEAL AND DENYING

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 28] 16 Plaintiff Stephen Keith brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. See Doc. No. 24 (“SAC”). On August 28, 2023, Defendants Matthew Ayster and Ricardo Bautista (“Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Doc. No. 27. Defendants also seek to strike several paragraphs in the Second Amended Complaint as immaterial and impertinent under Rule 12(f). See id. at 9. In connection with their motion to dismiss, Defendants have filed a motion to file four exhibits under seal. See Doc. No. 28. According to their motion, Exhibits 1 and 2 are body worn camera footage,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.