Curry

Curry v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20233:23-cv-01148California2,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS CURRY, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01148-RBM-MSB

CDCR #P-74528,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL; AND

GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor;

KATHLEEN ALLISON, CDCR

(2) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED Secretary; J. HILL, Warden,

COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO

Defendants. STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 18 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

20 [Docs. 6, 7] 21 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June 15, 2023, Plaintiff Marcus Curry (“Plaintiff”), while incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Doc. 1 at 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See Doc. 2.) On July 6, 2023, the Court granted …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.