Wilson
Wilson v. Santana
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD J. WILSON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00250-RBM-DDL
CDCR #B93800,
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL
Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO vs. PROSECUTE
J. SANTANA, et al.,
16 Defendants. 17 18 Gerald J. Wilson (“Plaintiff” or “Wilson”), filed a civil rights action (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this Court on February 6, 2023. (Doc. 1.) The Court granted Wilson IFP status and screened his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. (Doc. 7.) The Court found Wilson’s First and Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Santana, Frijas, Ortiz, Van Buren, Casian were barred by the statute of limitations (id. at 9–11) and Plaintiff failed to state a First Amendment claim against Defendants Dole and Miguel (id. at 11–13) but Plaintiff had stated an Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Miguel (id. at 11–12). Defendants Castro, Igbinosa, Montes, Bojorquez, Rimbach, Bacomfield, Rhordanz, Zepp, Furlong, Eaken, Rowland,…