Amie

Amie v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20233:23-cv-01430California1,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIN RAMON AMIE, Case No.: 23cv1430 GPC (LR)

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Petitioner, WITHOUT PREJUDICE v.

J. HILL, Warden,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, who is a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a conviction from the Los Angeles County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons discussed below, the Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the filing fee or has qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Petition is subject to dismissal without prejudice. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. § foll. 2254. FAILURE TO USE PROPER FORM A Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.