Federal Trade Commission v. Automators LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20233:23-cv-01444California592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Case No. 23-cv-1444-BAS-LSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THE

COMPLAINT

AUTOMATORS LLC, et al.,

Defendants, (ECF No. 41)

PEREGRINE WORLDWIDE, LLC, Relief Defendant.

Defendants Automators LLC, Stryder Holdings LLC, Pelenea Ventures LLC, Roman Cresto, John Cresto, and Andrew Chapman and Relief Defendant Peregrine Worldwide, LLC (collectively, the “Moving Defendants”) move for an extension of time to answer the FTC’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) until October 23, 2023 (Mot., ECF No. 41). They claim an extension is needed to “give [Moving] Defendants’ counsel sufficient time to investigate the facts, so they can properly evaluate the FTC[’]s claims,” and to “explore an early resolution to this case with the FTC.” (Mot. ¶ 4.) Furthermore, Moving Defendants aver an extension also would enhance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.