Arnold

I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA || Chad ARNOLD, Case No.: 23-cv-1396-AGS-KSC Petitioner,] ORDER DISMISSING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PETITION (ECF 1) AND DENYING AS MOOT 6 || COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO REMAINING MOTIONS CORPORATION, et al., (ECF 2, 3, 5, 6) Respondents. 8 In his habeas petition, Chad Arnold challenges a child-support order and a state- court warrant for failing to comply with that order. (See generally ECF 1.) But writs of ||habeas corpus extend only to those “in custody,” and Arnold does not appear to qualify. 12 || See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 475 (1976) (explaining the history of writs of habeas 13 || corpus); 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) (limiting federal courts’ habeas review to “the ground that he |lis in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States”). |}Arnold lists a mailing address in Vista, California, that does not correspond to any 16 ||…